Mediante el Auto 01 de 2023, expedido el pasado 1 de febrero, la Sala de Reconocimiento de la JEP imputó a un primer grupo de 10 comparecientes exintegrantes de las columnas móviles Jacobo Arenas y Gabriel Galvis de las extintas FARC-EP, por su presunta participación en crímenes de guerra y de lesa humanidad cometidos en el norte del Cauca y sur del Valle del Cauca, zona priorizada en el caso 05.

El pasado 04 de julio de 2023, la Sala de Reconocimiento de Verdad y Responsabilidad determinó los hechos y conductas a través del Auto 01 de 2023. En esta, estableció los hechos y conductas atribuibles a los antiguos miembros del Comando Conjunto Central de las FARC-EP, por la: (i) toma de rehenes, ( i) graves privaciones de la libertad y i) otros crímenes no amnistiables cometidos de manera concurrente. Aquí te contamos en qué consiste esta decisión.

La Sala de Reconocimiento de Verdad y Responsabilidad (SRVR) a través del Auto 05 de 2023 dio apertura al macocaso
11, denomiando “Violencia basada en género, violencia sexual, violencia reproductiva, y otros crímenes cometidos por
prejuicio basados en la orientación sexual, la expresión y/o identidad de género diversa [(“OSIGD”)] en el marco del
conflicto armado colombiano”, ¿cuál es la relevancia de este caso?, ¿de qué tratará? Aquí te lo contamos.

Esta decisión surge como resultado de un recurso de apelación contra un auto de selección negativa, y aborda una serie de asuntos clave que son de suma importancia en el ámbito legal. Sumérgete en temas como la selección negativa y su apelación, la selección negativa modulada, la aplicación del artículo 129 de la JEP por la SRVR y la SDSJ, y el régimen de condicionalidad estricto.

On August 31, 2022, through Ruling TP-SA 1186 of 2022, the Appeals Section publicly announced the decisions reached in the case of Salvatore Mancuso Gómez. In this capsule you will find six facts you should know about this decision, as well as the statements he provided before the Chamber for Definition of Judicial Situations.

This capsule presents the most important points that the SJP revealed regarding the three new macro-cases announced in March 2022, their subject matter and their importance for the victims.
 

In this capsule, the decision taken by the SJP regarding the rejection of the submission of Alias "Otoniel" as third-party civilian is presented. It develops the reasons taken into account by the Chamber for the Determination of Legal Status for the rejection under the analysis of the condition that the person appearing wanted to prove.

This capsule addresses the background of the 2019 sentence SENIT 1, the principles and objectives of interpretive sentences and other points developed in the sentence, such as the contributions program, the benefits of appearants and the participation of victims.

This capsule analyzes the implications of the declarations of Iván Márquez and Jesús Santrich - both for them and for the peace process - and presents the proceedings carried out after the declarations by the Chamber of Recognition and the Appeals Section

This capsule addresses various issues related to the competence of the SJP in relation to the paramilitary phenomenon such as: (i) the factors of the SJP´s competence, (ii) the jurisprudential line of the Appeals Section in this regard and (iii) the main points developed by the Chamber for Amnesty or Pardon in Ruling No. 199 of 2019.

This capsule addresses the SJP’s decision to grant the guarantee of non-extradition to Jesús Santrich upon the request by the US for the alleged commission of drug trafficking after signature of the Peace Agreement.

When is a case referred to the UIA? In this capsule we address this issue with regards to the case of Luis Fernando Almario, given that he did not accept his responsibility for the facts of macro-case 001.

By means of Ruling No. 159 of 2021, the SJP announced the internal prioritization route of macro-case 007, called "Recruitment and use of children in the armed conflict". In this capsule we highlight the most important points of this decision.

In this capsule we present the most relevant information about the subcase Catatumbo of macro-case 003 related to the criminal patterns identified; the circumstances that contributed to covering up the deeds and all the damages suffered by the victims.

En esta cápsula presentamos los puntos más importantes que se deben conocer para entender el Subcaso Costa Caribe del caso 003.

In this capsule we present the most relevant information about the subcase Catatumbo of macro-case 003 related to the criminal patterns identified; the circumstances that contributed to covering up the deeds and all the damages suffered by the victims.

This capsule addresses the main aspects addressed by the Chamber of Recognition in the Ruling of Determination of Facts and Conducts of the subcase Norte de Santander (macro-case 003)

En esta cápsula presentamos los puntos más importantes que se deben conocer para entender el Subcaso Costa Caribe del caso 003.

This capsule addresses the main aspects developed by the Chamber of Recognition in the Ruling of Determination of Facts and Conducts of the subcase Norte de Santander (macro-case 003).

In this capsule, we summarize and present the most relevant information about the internal prioritization of macro-case 003, which deals with illegitimate killings presented by State Agents as war causalities.

In dieser Kapsel stellen wir die Hauptmerkmale, die Aufgaben sowie die Funktionsweise der Sondergerichtsbarkeit für den Frieden in Kolumbien vor.

This capsule summarizes the nature of macro-case 001 - what are its origins, what is investigated within its scope and what can be expected from this investigation.

This capsule addresses the FARC-EP pronouncements that were delivered on September 30, 2020 to the SJP and what impacts they may have.

In this capsule, we explain the procedure for the election of a new president and vice-president of the SJP, as well as their functions.

This capsule, based on statements by former FARC-EP members, addresses five key points regarding the recognition of truth and responsibility as well as macro-case 007.

This capsule addresses the principles, characteristics and procedures that must be followed in order to impose a sanction, pre-endorse a TOAR and advance the process of monitoring and follow-up of sanctions.

This capsule presents the reasons why the Constitutional Court considered that the limitation of the competences of the SJP on certain crimes committed by third parties and AENIFPU was unconstitutional.